Conrad Black On the Attack

I noticed part three of an exchange between Conrad Black from prison and Michael Wolff, recent biographer of Rupert Murdoch, turn up in the National Post. (See the links inside for part I and II) Great reading.

Many thanks to Michael Wolff for his non-defense defense of his book about Rupert Murdoch against my review of it on The Daily Beast. I pointed out as many errors, inanities, and outbursts of implausible mind-reading as I could fit into a 900-word piece, in approximate order of their absurdity, and effectively declassified the book as a work of nonfiction. The usual recourse of writers caught in the dissemination of such pelagic incontinences of drivel as Wolff is to pretend to ignore the review. As I hoped and expected, he could not do that and responded without a word of demurral or argument on the merits.

Instead, this syntactically challenged, scatologically obsessed myth-maker swaddled himself in Victorian bourgeois priggishness and wrote that the fact that I am a convicted criminal (proudly) serving my (unjust) sentence in a US prison deprives me of any right to criticize him. Further, I am mad “in squalor [and] constantly mocked;" am illustrative of the worthlessness of the Internet (his chosen medium of reply), and have formed a triangle of Internet evil with Tina Brown and Eliot Spitzer.

Read the whole thing. I have to admire Black's toughness these days. He's rising above his situation.

Conrad Black on Harper vs. Ignatieff

I was pleased to see that Conrad Black published an article today about the current political situation in Canada, in particular focusing on the Liberal and Conservative leaders. I'm currently reading Black's excellent biography,The Invincible Quest: The Life of Richard Milhous Nixon. What makes it compelling reading is his ability to describe the tactics and intrigue of the political process. (I will have a review of this book coming soon.)

Despite his current predicament, his sense of humour and wit are still intact. Laurier vs. Macdonald, Ignatieff vs. Harper

Michael Ignatieff removed any lingering doubt that he had the character to lead when he did not scheme against the hapless Dion, and kept his distance from the hare-brained exploration of a coalition government with Jack Layton and Gilles Duceppe. Canada needs, and surely deserves, deliverance from the sort of nasty, hyperactive political adolescents who confected that mad enterprise.

I think Black might be a bit too generous here. It wouldn't be a stretch of the imagination that Iggy schemed against Dion. Also, during his interview with CBC this week, he was unsuccessful in distancing himself from the coalition. I think the Tories will pound home that he was a signatory of this agreement over and over. He'll have to dream up a convincing counter-measure to this attack. He hasn't yet.

Perhaps because of the brilliance of the Florida summer sun, compounded by the foibles of my American hosts, I have been conducting a completely unnoticed, rear-guard argument in favour of the theory that Stephen Harper is something of a Mackenzie King, an ungalvanizing public personality but a cunning political operator.

It is conceivable that there was an element of calculation in his suggestion of ceasing to finance political parties, reviewing some of the rigidities of pay equity, and revisiting the right to strike in the public service. These are all respectable policy options, and my impression is that the country was more offended by the absurd opposition response than by Harper's heavy-handed, yet sneaky and reckless introduction of these thoughts in a financial message. This episode should be out of mind when the budget is presented in January, but Harper can still revive these issues more promisingly, later.

Read it all.